Trump halts major Israeli strikes on Iran amid internal conflict

In early 2025, tensions escalated within the Trump administration regarding the approach to Iran's nuclear capabilities. The U.S. Presidential administration was reportedly facing significant internal disagreements, known as 'internal knife fighting,' about whether to pursue military options against Iran. As a result of these divisions, three high-ranking Pentagon officials were placed on administrative leave amid investigations into alleged leaks, which occurred following a canceled plan for a coordinated U.S.-Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear facilities. The proposed strikes had emerged from discussions aimed at countering Iran's nuclear threat, which the Trump administration had long deemed unacceptable. During months of deliberation, National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and General Michael E. Kurilla expressed support for the Israeli military plans. Initial indications suggested that President Trump might agree to a joint action, but opposition grew from key advisors, including Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Gabbard, along with others in Trump's inner circle including Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Vice President JD Vance, raised concerns that a military strike could lead to a larger conflict in the region. Ultimately, Trump opted for diplomatic solutions over military action, prioritizing talks with Iran. This shift occurred despite reports indicating that Israeli officials were crafting plans for a more limited strike on Iranian nuclear sites that would require less support from the U.S. They intended to present various options for such strikes, focusing on executing them with minimal impact and avoiding extensive engagement. Nevertheless, Trump's preference was for a diplomatic approach as he encouraged Iran to consider a peaceful future, stating, 'I think that Iran has a chance to have a great country and to live happily without death.' This strategic pivot angered some in Israel who believed a military approach was necessary to prevent Iran from achieving nuclear weapons capability. Despite the U.S.'s refusal to support Israeli military action, negotiations between the U.S. and Iran continued. Discussions held in Rome indicated that some progress was made, although apprehensions remained regarding Iran's commitments and actions. The internal conflict within the Trump administration may complicate future U.S.-Israel collaborations and the broader strategy toward Iran amidst regional unrest and security concerns.