Trump administration seeks to rollback forest protections for 58 million acres

On June 23, 2025, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced plans to revoke the 2001 Roadless Rule during a meeting of the Western Governors Association. This rule currently protects nearly 59 million acres of national forests across the United States from logging, mining, and road construction. Rollins criticized the rule as outdated and overly restrictive, arguing it impedes the ability to manage forest resources effectively and reduce wildfire risks. Supporters of the rescission believe it will enhance local forest management and promote responsible timber production, while environmental advocates have raised alarms about the potential damage to wildlife habitats and drinking water sources. The Roadless Rule was originally enacted during the final days of President Bill Clinton's administration and has been a focal point of controversy since then, particularly in states like Alaska and Utah where large areas of forest are covered by this regulation. Proponents of the rollback claim it would allow for a more proactive approach to fire prevention and sustainable timber harvest, citing that many areas within national forests face increased risks of wildfire due to restrictive management practices. Critics argue that loosening these protections would be detrimental to environmental health, increase wildfire risks, and undermine decades of conservation efforts. Many scientists and environmental organizations contend that logging in these areas could lead to more intense wildfires instead of preventing them, as roads and logging activities make forest areas more vulnerable to fire starts. The USDA claims that about 28 million acres of the affected lands are at high risk for wildfires, and they assert that increasing timber harvest can help manage these risks. The announcement initiated strong backlash from environmental groups, who plan to challenge the decision legally. They argue that the rollback serves the interests of the timber industry at the expense of public lands and ecosystems. This unfolding situation highlights the ongoing debate in the United States over land management, environmental protections, and economic interests linked to natural resources. It raises questions about balancing conservation with industry needs, a long-standing issue with implications for future generations and the health of the country's forests.