Jim Jordan declares Trump-Russia investigation circumstances are worse than we thought
- Jim Jordan discussed the Trump-Russia investigation on FNC's 'Hannity,' emphasizing its serious implications.
- He claimed the investigation originated in efforts to undermine Trump's presidency well after the 2016 election.
- Jordan's assertions echo ongoing Republican claims about a conspiracy, illustrating deep partisan divides over the investigation.
In the United States, amid ongoing discussions surrounding the Trump-Russia collusion investigation, Representative Jim Jordan publicly voiced his opinions on the matter during an appearance on Fox News Channel's 'Hannity.' Jordan discussed Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's recent criminal referral to the Department of Justice, alleging involvement by the Obama administration to instigate the investigation into collusion between Donald Trump's campaign and Russia. He expressed that the circumstances were 'worse than we thought,' referring to the revelations emerging from these inquiries. Jordan traced the origins of the investigation back to 2016, suggesting that it was not only an effort to prevent Trump from winning the 2016 election but also aimed at undermining his presidency post-election. He specifically highlighted a meeting in December 2016 held by then-President Obama with key figures from the intelligence community, including Loretta Lynch, James Comey, James Clapper, and John Brennan. During this meeting, Obama allegedly advised against moving forward with the intelligence community's assessment of Russian interference in the election. He claimed that three weeks later, statements from Chuck Schumer indicated that messing with the intelligence community could lead to severe repercussions. Furthermore, just three days after Schumer's comments, key intelligence officials briefed Trump. Instead of a standard briefing, Jordan insisted it was a setup involving discussions about the false dossier linking Trump to Russian collusion, which ultimately was leaked to the media, giving it unwarranted credibility. The impact of Jordan's claims was further explored as the media and various political figures reacted to Gabbard's report and the surrounding allegations. Many Republicans, including Senate Republicans and House Speaker Mike Johnson, echoed Jordan's sentiments about the alleged conspiracy, while news organizations critiqued Gabbard's claims as lacking substance. Ultimately, Jordan's assertions reflect the polarized environment surrounding the Trump-Russia scandal, where narratives differ sharply depending on political affiliations, leading to ongoing disputes and calls for accountability.