La Liga accuses Barcelona of sports corruption amid potential sanctions
- La Liga president Javier Tebas accused FC Barcelona of sports corruption during a podcast on September 19, 2024.
- The accusations relate to payments made to former referee José María Enríquez Negreira, which Barcelona claims were for legitimate consulting work.
- Tebas believes the club will face sanctions, and the case is expected to lead to a lengthy trial.
On September 19, 2024, La Liga president Javier Tebas publicly accused FC Barcelona of engaging in sports corruption during an appearance on The Wild Project podcast. He expressed his belief that the club would face sanctions due to these allegations. The accusations stem from payments made by Barcelona to former referee José María Enríquez Negreira, which the club claims were for legitimate consultation services. However, Tebas suggested that these payments were intended to create the illusion of influence over referee decisions, although he doubted that any direct payments to referees would be proven in court. The case against Barcelona has been ongoing since March of the previous year, when the club was charged with "continued corruption between individuals in the sports field." Real Madrid, Barcelona's long-standing rival, has also played a role in the accusations. Despite the serious nature of the allegations, Tebas noted that there has been no evidence to support claims that referees were directly bribed. Tebas emphasized that the situation is likely to be prolonged, predicting that a trial would be necessary to resolve the matter. He acknowledged the complexity of the case and the challenges in proving the allegations against Barcelona. The club's current president, Joan Laporta, has consistently maintained that the payments were for honest consulting work, which adds another layer of contention to the ongoing dispute. As the investigation continues, the implications for FC Barcelona could be significant, potentially affecting their reputation and standing within La Liga. The outcome of this case may set a precedent for how similar allegations are handled in the future, highlighting the need for transparency and integrity in sports governance.