BBC presenter sparks debate after correcting 'pregnant people' to 'women'
- Martine Croxall altered 'pregnant people' to 'women' during a live broadcast on June 21.
- The broadcast discussed alarming research predicting nearly 600 heat-related deaths in the U.K.
- The incident has sparked widespread discussion about political correctness and gender terminology in media.
In the United Kingdom, a BBC News presenter named Martine Croxall gained significant attention on social media after she made a live correction during a broadcast on June 21, 2025. While reporting on research from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine about expected heat-related deaths, Croxall read from the autocue and altered the phrase 'pregnant people' to 'women.' Her decision to make this change was viewed as a bold statement against politically correct language. The research discussed was alarming; it forecasted nearly 600 expected heat-related deaths in the U.K., specifically emphasizing that vulnerable populations, including pregnant individuals and the elderly, should take necessary precautions against heat exposure. Croxall's substitution within the live broadcast, delivered by Malcolm Mistry, a professional involved in the research, generated considerable social media buzz, with diverse reactions reflecting public sentiments regarding gender terminology. Over the weekend following the broadcast, Croxall expressed her gratitude to her followers on social media platform X, where she acknowledged the varied responses the clip had received. This incident sparked a discussion not only about language usage in media but also about societal views on gender identity and representation. Supporters of Croxall praised her for what they perceived as courageousness in the face of political correctness, while some critics questioned the implications of her wording choice in light of contemporary discussions around gender. Additionally, the BBC's style guide does not specifically dictate the terminology related to pregnancy, allowing presenters some leeway in their choices during broadcasts. The matter encapsulates a wider cultural debate currently taking place regarding inclusive language and representation in media, especially concerning women and people who can conceive but may not identify strictly as women. The ongoing dialogue touches on the importance of acknowledging experiences and identities across various groups while navigating the sensitivities associated with language in public discourse. It indicates a potential shift in societal perspectives regarding gender nomenclature and highlights the role of media figures in shaping these conversations. Croxall's decision to vocalize her belief during an official broadcast could hint at a growing resistance against conforming to language deemed overly politically correct, marking a pivotal moment in discussions surrounding gender identity in news media. Prominent figures in the literary and public spheres, such as J.K. Rowling, have shown support for Croxall, which further inflates the media narrative surrounding this incident. The public's response has been varied and can be seen through the lens of differing beliefs about gender issues. Activism for inclusive language has gained momentum, yet Croxall's stance stands as a point of contention, showcasing the ongoing tensions in modern society over how language evolves and adapts to cultural changes.