Connecticut veterans cemetery expansion faces fierce local opposition
- Local opposition has blocked the proposed expansion of the Connecticut state veterans cemetery in Middletown.
- Residents express concerns over property values and potential risks to drinking water due to the proposed expansion.
- Officials are seeking new solutions as space for new burials is expected to run out within three years.
In Connecticut, veterans officials are currently facing significant challenges regarding the expansion of the state veterans cemetery in Middletown. With projected space for new burials expected to run out within the next three years, the officials initially proposed to acquire about 90 acres of open space from the city to accommodate the expansion. However, this plan was met with strong local opposition. Residents voiced their concerns during a council meeting, arguing that the proposed location for expansion was not suitable and could lead to a decrease in property values and potential risks to drinking water sources. Some residents, organized under the group Residents Against Institutional Dumping, have historically opposed such developments, advocating for the land to remain designated for open space or recreational use. Veteran Philip Pessina spoke passionately about the need for the cemetery's expansion, urging that it is crucial to honor those who have served and ensure adequate space for future burials. Meanwhile, local homeowner Ralph Wilson raised worries regarding the potential adverse effects on property values and the safety of drinking water, citing that local homeowners could face a significant drop in their property values. Despite the concerns raised about water contamination and property values, some local leaders, like Ken McClellan, president of The Greater Middletown Military Museum, expressed surprise at the strong opposition and argued that the cemetery has safely existed in the area for decades. He emphasized that moving the cemetery to a different location would not only be a waste of resources but also inconvenient for families visiting the graves of their loved ones. The transition from an available burial site to one with limited capacity has sparked heated discussions within the community, reflecting the longstanding tension between development and preservation of open spaces in the region.