Quakers challenge DHS policy allowing ICE arrests in churches

In January 2025, several Quaker congregations in the United States filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in federal court. This legal action arose in response to a recent policy change that removed the restrictions on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from conducting operations in sensitive locations, which include houses of worship, schools, and hospitals. Historically, a policy preventing such activities without prior approval has been in place since the early 1990s, serving to protect undocumented individuals and encourage their integration into society by allowing them to access essential services without the fear of deportation. The Quaker plaintiffs argue that this policy reversal directly threatens the well-being and stability of their communities, particularly for immigrant members who may now feel deterred from attending worship services. They contend that this change infringes upon their First Amendment rights and undermines the core principles of religious freedom in the United States. By taking legal action, these Quaker groups not only aim to challenge the DHS policy but also to highlight the broader implications it may have on various faith-based organizations across the nation. The lawsuit claims that the new ICE protocols instill anxiety and create a chilling effect on congregant attendance, thus hindering religious practices and community engagement. The backlash against this change has included vocal opposition from faith leaders, educators, and local officials, all advocating for the preservation of safe spaces for congregational worship. Although the acting ICE director has asserted that there will not be widespread operations in these sensitive locations, the fear remains palpable among those who rely on these communal gatherings for spiritual support. This lawsuit represents a significant moment in the intersection of immigration enforcement and religious liberty, showcasing the ongoing struggle many faith leaders face in maintaining their right to gather and worship freely in light of changing federal policies.