Scholz urges EU to delay deforestation law for practicality
- Germany's Chancellor Olaf Scholz has called for the postponement of the European Union Deforestation Regulation, emphasizing the need for the regulation to be practical.
- Concerns have been raised by various stakeholders, including the German digital and newspapers publishers association, regarding the law's bureaucratic burden and its potential impact on trade.
- The call for a delay reflects broader apprehensions about the regulation's implications for global trade and the livelihoods of small farmers in producing countries.
Chancellor Olaf Scholz of Germany has become the first head of government to advocate for the postponement of the European Union Deforestation Regulation. Speaking at a conference in Berlin, he highlighted the need for the regulation to be practical, referencing discussions with Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Scholz's remarks come in response to concerns raised by the German digital and newspapers publishers association, which criticized the law for its impractical requirements and significant bureaucratic burden on companies. As the application date of the regulation approaches, various stakeholders, including a coalition of EU countries led by Austria, have called for urgent revisions. The regulation mandates that companies provide evidence that certain commodities do not originate from deforested lands, a requirement that has been met with resistance from trade partners, particularly in South America. Brazil has expressed fears that the regulation could harm its exports to the EU, labeling it a unilateral and punitive measure. The legislation is seen as a critical step in the global fight against deforestation, yet it has sparked significant debate over its complexity and potential negative impacts on small farmers, particularly in countries like Indonesia and Malaysia. Critics argue that the law could financially strain those least able to bear the costs, a claim the Commission has disputed. In light of these challenges, Scholz's call for a delay underscores the need for a balanced approach that considers both environmental goals and the economic realities faced by producers. The ongoing discussions reflect a broader concern about the regulation's implications for global trade and the livelihoods of those in the agricultural sector.