US refuses to extend UNIFIL mandate, risking security in Lebanon
- The U.S. declined to back the renewal of UNIFIL's mandate in Lebanon, citing failure to control Hezbollah.
- Israel has accused UNIFIL of being ineffective in ensuring security in southern Lebanon.
- The decision heightens tensions and could lead to instability due to a reduced international presence.
In August 2025, the United States decided not to support the renewal of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) mandate, which had been set to expire on August 31. This decision came after significant criticism from Israel, which termed the UNIFIL operation an 'abject failure' for its inability to limit Hezbollah's military capabilities. Despite attempts from France to secure a renewal with revised terms including strategic withdrawal provisions, the U.S. rejected the proposal, emphasizing the need for an immediate phased withdrawal instead of an extension. The situation in Lebanon remains fragile, with the Lebanese government faced with a crucial decision to disarm Hezbollah amidst pressure from international actors, especially given the historic tensions in the region. Additionally, the mayor of Kiryat Shmona highlighted the threat posed by Hezbollah, suggesting that U.S. pressure for Israeli withdrawal could lead to instability and potential ground invasions from Hezbollah. This complex scenario underscores the ongoing struggle in Lebanon to re-establish sovereignty and ensure security for its citizens. The deteriorating trust in UNIFIL further complicates international efforts and raises questions about the effectiveness of existing peacekeeping missions in volatile regions.