Players debate fun versus realism in Civilization video games

Since 1991, the Civilization video game franchise has captivated players with its empire-building mechanics, allowing players to guide a civilization from antiquity to modern ages. The games provide the flexibility to play on real-world maps where civilizations begin in historically accurate locations, attracting players who prefer a slice of history blended into their gaming experience. However, the latest installment offers a significant degree of customization, presenting players with three different civilizations during a single playthrough, leading to varied gameplay experiences based on the chosen identity and strategy throughout different ages. A central theme in the franchise has been the ongoing tension between the historical accuracy of the gameplay and its inherent fun factor. Some players enjoy the challenge of simulating world history as closely as possible, while others revel in the creative liberties the game offers, allowing them to play political scenarios that drastically differ from historical facts. This playful engagement can lead to unconventional scenarios, such as players taking on the roles of leaders like Gandhi, who in the game can pursue militaristic victories, a stark contrast to the real-life figure’s principles. The strategic choices available to players lead to moral dilemmas which introduce an interesting dynamic into the gameplay. Different government forms in the game have unique benefits and relationships with other civilizations. For instance, adopting an authoritarian regime may yield faster military unit production, thus pushing players towards that choice for a military victory, regardless of the moral implications. On the other hand, democracies tend to foster better relationships with each other, influencing diplomatic strategies throughout gameplay. While the game mechanics offer a fun diversion, they do not completely mimic historical scientific progress and disputes over government structures. The introduction of features such as a culture tree in Civilization VI has added depth to gameplay, spanning cultural evolution from ancient to modern times. The absence of futuristic gameplay elements in Civilization VII indicates a strategic choice made by the developers, suggesting that perhaps they aim to keep players grounded in time periods that resonate with historical events and figures rather than allow flights of fantastical imagination. The growing player base, along with the increased complexity of gameplay mechanics, continues to invite discussion about whether the franchise should focus on genuine historical representation or prioritize the enjoyment factor in future titles.