Gaza Humanitarian Foundation rejects AP claims of contractors firing on civilians
- The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation refuted claims that its contractors used live ammunition and stun grenades at aid sites.
- The AP cited anonymous contractors to support its claims, which GHF stated were based on false assertions.
- GHF emphasized its commitment to delivering aid safely, amidst ongoing tensions and accusations in Gaza.
In Gaza, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israeli-backed American organization, issued a statement refuting allegations made in a report by the Associated Press (AP) concerning its contractors' conduct at aid distribution sites. The accusations suggested that American security contractors were utilizing live ammunition and stun grenades to control crowds of Palestinians seeking food, which potentially endangered civilian lives. The AP's report included testimony from two anonymous U.S. contractors who expressed their concerns about unsafe practices. These allegations prompted GHF to launch an immediate investigation. The investigation relied on time-stamped video footage and sworn witness statements gathered by the GHF, which ultimately concluded that the claims made in the AP story were wholly inaccurate. The organization maintained that at no point were civilians targeted by gunfire from its security contractors, arguing instead that the sounds of gunfire recorded in accompanying videos originated from the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) stationed at a distance from the aid sites. While videos included in the report showed intense scenes with Palestinians in distress, GHF insisted that no individuals were shot or injured within the immediate vicinity where aid was distributed. As part of its rebuttal, the GHF expressed concerns regarding the ethical standards of the AP, especially criticizing its decision not to share the full video footage prior to publication. According to GHF, the primary source for AP's report appeared to be a disgruntled former contractor who had been dismissed for misconduct weeks earlier. This former contractor’s claims were characterized by GHF as driven by personal grievances rather than factual representation. In response to the serious nature of the allegations, GHF had already terminated the employment of the contractor featured in the controversial video. The situation is further complicated by the broader context of humanitarian aid in Gaza, where accusations and claims often arise. GHF emphasized its commitment to delivering food aid safely, without interference or harm to the civilian population. The ongoing conflict and its ramifications have led to numerous parties, such as Hamas, attempting to leverage such situations to bolster their narratives. Critically, the organization noted that past allegations against it had typically been fueled by misleading reports, often pushed by groups like Hamas. These dynamics highlight the ongoing tensions and the difficulties of legally and ethically providing humanitarian assistance in a conflict zone.