A British Preview of Kamala’s Challenges

Keir Starmer, the new Labour prime minister of Britain, holds a significant majority in Parliament, yet his party's recent electoral success is marred by a lack of a strong popular mandate, having secured only 34 percent of the vote. This situation reflects a history of Labour's electoral missteps and Starmer's cautious approach to governance. He is focused on avoiding mistakes that could jeopardize his position, which has led to a risk-averse administration. The pressing need for public investment in Britain is evident, as the country faces challenges in housing, public services, and job creation. Starmer's government is constrained by a long-standing commitment to fiscal prudence, a principle rooted in the policies of former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. This has limited the government's ability to invest in necessary modernization efforts, particularly in light of the economic changes following Brexit. One potential area for improvement is tax collection, as the previous Conservative government underfunded the tax office, resulting in significant revenue losses. However, even enhanced tax enforcement will not suffice to meet the financial demands of revitalizing the economy. Starmer's reluctance to address Britain's relationship with the EU further complicates his position, as he may delay any significant policy shifts until a potential second term. In contrast, Kamala Harris in the U.S. has made strides in moving away from outdated neoliberal policies and is better positioned to implement bold public investments. The U.S. benefits from the dollar's status as a global currency, allowing for more robust economic initiatives. Both leaders face the imperative to deliver results to secure re-election, as their governments represent a critical defense against rising neofascism in the West.