Google claims 350 million users signed up for Gemini despite skepticism

In a recent court session, Google revealed significant user statistics concerning its Gemini platform, capturing the attention of the tech community. As of March 2025, Gemini reportedly boasted 350 million monthly active users. This disclosure raises eyebrows, especially considering the nature of users noted in the metric. Critics argue that the figure may not accurately represent genuine engagement levels but instead includes individuals interacting with various services where Gemini features are integrated. For instance, many users may not realize they are using Gemini when accessing tools like Google Assistant or receiving AI-driven suggestions in Google searches. Conversations surrounding the legitimacy of the user count highlight the ongoing difficulties Google faces in providing transparency and clarity regarding the usage of its AI technologies. Many stakeholders view this self-reported number with skepticism, suggesting that branding existing services under the Gemini banner inflates the user count. Some individuals express frustration over encountering persistent prompts to use Gemini features that seem to intrude into their usual digital interactions without being fully aware of the implications. It is crucial to comprehend the context in which these claims are made. The competitive landscape of generative AI technologies has intensified, particularly in light of ChatGPT's growing popularity. Despite Google's established presence in the market, this data points to an uphill battle in winning user trust and ensuring favorable engagement metrics that reflect real-world usability. How diverse user experiences are accounted for in these statistics becomes fundamental in assessing Gemini's actual adoption. As the conversation unfolds, stakeholders, including users and industry analysts, continue to scrutinize Google's mechanisms for tracking engagement. This discourse not only pertains to Gemini's performance but also reflects broader trends in technology companies' attempts to leverage AI tools, often aimed at enhancing user experience without compromising transparency. The implications of how user data is portrayed could further influence consumer trust in Google's evolving relationship with generative AI applications.