Mar 24, 2025, 1:14 AM
Mar 21, 2025, 9:45 PM

Chancellor orders civil service cuts to save £2 billion

Highlights
  • Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to cut £2 billion from the civil service budget by 2029-30.
  • The cuts will focus on administrative expenditures, sparing frontline services.
  • These measures aim to balance public spending without raising taxes, despite concerns from unions.
Story

In the United Kingdom, Chancellor Rachel Reeves is preparing to unveil substantial budget cuts for the civil service during her spring statement in the upcoming days. This plan involves an immediate reduction of £1.5 billion in administrative budgets by the end of 2028-29, followed by additional cuts expected to amount to £2.2 billion in the subsequent years. The main target for these cuts includes administrative expenses such as human resources, policy advice, and office management rather than frontline services like law enforcement and public health. This strategy is part of a broader spending review aimed at balancing the government's budget amidst disappointing growth forecasts and lower-than-expected tax revenues. The Chancellor has firmly stated that there will be no tax increases, aiming to adhere to strict fiscal rules that exclude borrowing for day-to-day spending. Unions have expressed concerns regarding these drastic cuts, warning that such measures might negatively affect public services and overall service delivery. The significant reduction in administrative spending is intended to reallocate resources to frontline services, including education and policing, reflecting the government's changes following its pledge to reduce bureaucracy. However, it is anticipated that the cuts will lead to substantial job reductions within the civil service, prompting calls from unions for greater transparency about which services will be affected. This situation is exacerbated by the government's commitment to increase defense spending while simultaneously seeking significant savings in the welfare budget, adding a layer of complexity to their fiscal plans.

Opinions

You've reached the end