Judge Determines If Stephen King's 'Cujo' Should Be Considered Scary
- A judge is weighing in on whether the horror novel 'Cujo' by Stephen King is indeed a scary book.
- The discussion raises questions about the necessity of reading the book to form an opinion on its scariness.
- This event highlights the intersection of literature, law, and subjective interpretation.
In a recent exchange, a reader named Sean expressed his differing opinion on Stephen King's novel "Cujo," igniting a debate with his partner. While she finds the premise of being trapped in a car by a rabid dog terrifying, Sean, who has not read the book, believes the scenario is exaggerated and not particularly frightening. He questions the realism of the situation, suggesting that a dog would eventually tire and fall asleep. Sean further elaborates on the tragic nature of "Cujo," describing the titular character as a good dog who succumbs to madness after a fateful encounter with rabid bats. He draws a parallel between Cujo's unfortunate decision and the impulsive actions of his partner, who he accuses of seeking validation through a public declaration about the book without having read it. In a tongue-in-cheek manner, Sean critiques his partner's approach, suggesting that her judgment is superficial and lacks depth. He encourages her to read the novel, asserting that it is a quick read and one of King's most impactful works. Ultimately, Sean expresses a mix of envy and anticipation for his partner's first experience with "Cujo," hoping that the emotional weight of the story will resonate with her as it did with him. He concludes with a provocative remark, implying that the story's conclusion will be a fitting emotional challenge for her.