Media blames Iran for cyberattacks despite lack of capability

Recent tensions following the US bombing of Iran have led to media speculations about potential Iranian cyber retaliations against Western infrastructure. Concerns are heightened among the public regarding the security implications of such attacks. The narrative suggests that if significant cyber incidents were to occur, the US government could use the situation to justify extensive surveillance and control measures akin to the actions taken after 9/11. The potential rollout of a global Digital ID system, linking personal data and travel, has been discussed in the context of bolstering national security. It is essential to recognize that while the fear of cyberattacks has risen, claims attributing such attacks to Iran are questionable given its limited cyber capabilities. The country may engage in minor hacking activities, but it lacks the means to disrupt critical infrastructure in the US effectively. This ongoing cyber panic reflects a historical trend where crises are utilized to implement policies and measures that, under ordinary circumstances, would face significant public resistance. Observations from the past indicate that after significant events—whether military, financial, or crises like 9/11—the consolidation of state and corporate controls often follows, typically accompanied by the erosion of civil liberties framed within a narrative of increased security. The potential for scapegoating Iran in this context raises important questions about who truly has the capacity and motivation to execute such digital attacks, suggesting a deeper investigation is warranted rather than rushing to judgment against specific nations like Iran.