US Funds to Taliban Inquiry
- The Biden administration is uncertain if taxpayer money sent to Afghanistan is reaching the Taliban due to incomplete vetting files.
- Reports indicate that $239 million was mistakenly sent to the Taliban because of a vetting failure by the State Department.
- Senator Joni Ernst has pressed for an inquiry into the money sent to the Taliban.
A recent government audit has revealed significant gaps in the Biden administration's oversight of taxpayer funds sent to Afghanistan, raising concerns that millions may have inadvertently benefited the Taliban. The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) reported that two State Department bureaus, the Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) and International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL), failed to provide necessary documentation to demonstrate compliance with partner vetting requirements. This lack of oversight affects at least $293 million in aid, complicating efforts to ensure that U.S. funds do not support terrorist activities. The audit highlights that the State Department violated federal document preservation requirements, making it difficult for investigators to ascertain whether Afghan partners were properly vetted for ties to the Taliban. SIGAR emphasized the increased risk of funds being diverted to terrorist-affiliated entities, underscoring the need for stringent compliance with vetting and documentation protocols as the U.S. continues to allocate aid in Taliban-controlled regions. In response to these findings, Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) has introduced an amendment to her Tracking Receipts to Adversarial Countries for Knowledge of Spending Act, which would mandate tracking and public disclosure of all U.S. funds sent to foreign adversaries, including the Taliban. Ernst criticized the administration's handling of aid, asserting that the mismanagement of taxpayer dollars is unacceptable and calling for immediate corrective actions. While the State Department has denied that any funds have directly supported the Taliban, it acknowledged compliance gaps in its vetting processes. The agency maintains that the majority of its Afghanistan-related awards adhere to established requirements, but the ongoing scrutiny raises questions about the effectiveness of current oversight measures.