Wayne Gretzky claims he has no political influence over leaders

In Canada, retired NHL star Wayne Gretzky recently addressed his influence over political figures in his first public comments following Donald Trump's second term initiation. During a radio show hosted by Ben Mulroney in Toronto, Gretzky emphasized that he does not possess any political power or influence over either the U.S. president or Canada's prime minister. He stated that the political dynamics are strictly between the leaders chosen by the electorate through elections, thus asserting his lack of pull or sway in political matters. This remark comes amid conversations about Gretzky's relationship with Trump and growing concerns among Canadians who perceive a connection between the hockey legend and the American president's controversial remarks regarding Canada potentially becoming the 51st U.S. state. Gretzky, who has consistently downplayed discussions around political affiliations, explained that he does not dwell on how others may use his name for their agendas. His comments reflect a broader sentiment among his fans and observers, some of whom have questioned why he does not take a firmer stand on Trump’s comments. On the show, the retired athlete also reminisced about his playing days, where he noted that politics was rarely, if ever, a topic of conversation amongst teammates. Instead, conversations would typically revolve around sports like basketball and baseball, indicating a deliberate separation between sports and politics. Despite his friendship with Trump, who has publicly suggested Gretzky might serve as Canada's governor if the country became a U.S. state, the hockey great maintains a clear boundary between his professional legacy and political affiliations. Throughout the interview, Gretzky emphasized his pride in being Canadian and conveyed the same patriotism to his American family, emphasizing the importance of respecting both nations' sovereignty and political dynamics. Ultimately, he avoided engaging in any political discourse, opting to stay in his lane as an athlete rather than entering the political arena. The discussion showcases the complexities and nuances surrounding celebrity influence in political matters, especially in light of significant statements made by Trump. As individuals like Gretzky navigate their public personas, their relationships with political figures are often scrutinized, raising questions about their obligations to voice concerns or support. In conclusion, Gretzky's remarks serve as a reminder that personal and political realms often collide in public life, but he asserts a firm commitment to remaining apolitical and focused on his legacy within sports.