Trump's government takes major stake in Intel worth $10 billion

In late August 2025, the U.S. government, under President Donald Trump, announced it would take a 10% stake in Intel, amounting to around $10 billion, marking a significant shift in federal involvement in the tech industry. This investment was portrayed as a critical move to ensure American supremacy in semiconductor technology, which is seen as integral to national security and economic stability. During various broadcasts, commentators compared this action to past government bailouts of industries, specifically highlighting concerns about the intricate and powerful role of computer chips in global dominance. The stake acquisition includes the additional funding stemming from the CHIPS Act, amplifying Intel’s financial backing derived from taxpayer money. Although officials like Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick suggested this investment would not result in direct governance or oversight of Intel, discussions surrounding the implications of a government-owned share in a private enterprise stirred fears of politicization in the tech sector. Critics, including members of Congress, expressed strong concerns that such moves could create conflicts of interest, particularly regarding export controls and foreign sales, including transactions with China. The decision triggered a broad array of reactions, from support among those who believe it ensures technological leadership to stark criticism from free-market advocates who argue it distorts market dynamics. Figures like Charles Payne on Fox News emphasized the importance of maintaining a competitive edge and criticized detractors of the deal. Moreover, doubts were raised about the sustainability of innovation in a landscape where the government has financial stakes in major firms, potentially disadvantaging new entrants and innovators. Ultimately, the acquisition is viewed as part of a growing trend of intertwining government roles with industry, blurring the lines that traditionally separated private enterprise from public policy. Observers fear this could lead to an increased reliance on governmental subsidies, further entrenching established corporations like Intel and diminishing opportunities for smaller, agile firms. As the U.S. navigates evolving tech landscapes, such unprecedented federal investments signal a significant pivot in economic strategy and long-term implications for the tech industry.