Sep 6, 2024, 8:25 PM
Sep 3, 2024, 12:00 AM

Michigan judge rules RFK Jr. stays on presidential ballot

Highlights
  • A Michigan judge ruled that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. must remain on the presidential ballot after he filed a lawsuit to withdraw.
  • Judge Christopher Yates dismissed Kennedy's request, stating that allowing him to withdraw would harm the Natural Law Party.
  • The ruling complicates Kennedy's strategy to boost Trump's chances in key states while he continues to seek ballot access elsewhere.
Story

A Michigan judge ruled on Tuesday that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. must remain on the presidential ballot after he sought to withdraw his candidacy. This decision came after Kennedy, who qualified for the ballot through the Natural Law Party, filed a lawsuit to remove himself, aiming to facilitate former President Donald Trump's chances in key states. Judge Christopher Yates dismissed Kennedy's request, emphasizing that elections are serious matters and that the Secretary of State is not required to accommodate candidates' whims. The judge noted that allowing Kennedy to withdraw at this stage would harm the Natural Law Party by leaving it without a candidate. This ruling complicates Kennedy's strategy to withdraw from competitive states while still pursuing ballot access in others where he believes his presence will not significantly affect the election outcome. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson reiterated that candidates who accept nominations from minor parties cannot withdraw, responding to claims of election interference from Trump ally Rudy Giuliani. Kennedy has faced challenges in other states as well, having successfully removed his name from some ballots but encountering obstacles in places like Wisconsin and North Carolina. The ruling underscores the complexities of election laws and the implications for minor party candidates, as Kennedy's actions could have broader effects on the electoral landscape, particularly in relation to Trump's campaign. As the election approaches, the dynamics between candidates and their respective parties continue to evolve, raising questions about the integrity and fairness of the electoral process.

Opinions

You've reached the end