Governor Wes Moore refuses to send Maryland National Guard to D.C

On August 24, 2025, in a significant interview on "Face the Nation," Maryland Governor Wes Moore articulated his opposition to the deployment of National Guardsmen to Washington, D.C. This move was initiated by President Trump, who called up around 2,300 National Guard personnel to assist local police forces amidst rising crime rates. Moore expressed concerns about the president's approach, indicating that using the National Guard in this manner is not a viable solution for crime issues prevalent in various cities, including Baltimore. He highlighted that many high-crime cities were already strained by the need for their National Guards, asserting that such actions might distract from addressing the root causes of crime and economic challenges that affect everyday Americans. Moreover, during the interview, Governor Moore criticized the president for what he perceived as a performative and politically motivated gesture that did not genuinely address the issues faced by community members. He pointed out that the current administration seems more focused on political preservation rather than on constructive measures that can assist local authorities. Moore sought acknowledgment from Washington regarding the ongoing struggles in communities that are willing to work towards progress but feel neglected by federal leadership. Discussions in the interview also touched upon requests from Baltimore's mayor for federal assistance, specifically asking for agents from the FBI, DEA, and ATF, rather than National Guard troops. Moore stressed the importance of following constitutional processes while urging federal authorities to support state and local efforts to manage crime effectively. The governor mentioned that the established methods for policing should focus on community-driven solutions rather than military intervention. In conclusion, the governor's firm refusal to deploy National Guardsmen to D.C. reflects his belief that such actions would exacerbate rather than alleviate the challenges faced by communities, as well as a call for a more involved and supportive federal approach to local problems.