Federal judge halts development project threatening endangered species in California
- A federal judge, Daniel Calabretta, has blocked the Stonegate Development Project in Chico, California, due to potential harm to endangered species.
- The project was set to build residential and commercial spaces, threatening wetlands and crucial habitats for various species.
- Environmental groups successfully challenged the project's approval, prompting a review of its Biological Opinion and ensuring protection for local wildlife.
In California, a federal judge named Daniel Calabretta recently halted the construction of the Stonegate Development Project, situated on a 314-acre terrain in Chico. This development was intended to encompass numerous residential and commercial facilities, including 423 single-family lots, 13.4 acres of multi-family housing, and 36.6 acres designated for commercial land use. However, environmental advocacy groups argued that the project would significantly harm local habitats critical for various threatened species, including the Butte County meadowfoam flower, the vernal pool fairy shrimp, and the giant garter snake. The judge's ruling reflects an increasing concern about development projects causing irreparable damage to ecologically sensitive areas. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers had approved the project in 2020, allowing it to move forward until this legal challenge arose. The lawsuit, spearheaded by organizations like the Center for Biological Diversity and AquAlliance, claimed that the project would destroy vital wetland habitats and that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service failed to provide an adequate Biological Opinion. This opinion had claimed that the project's damage to certain protected species would not jeopardize their continued existence, a determination the judge labeled as arbitrary and capricious. The court found fault with the federal defendants' presumed knowledge about the lack of sightings of the giant garter snake within a five-mile radius, stating that this assumption was flawed and disregarded potential impacts. Thus, the Stonegate Development Project will remain on hold while an adequate biological assessment is conducted to ensure no further harm comes to the protected species in the area. The ruling further emphasizes the ongoing legal and environmental battles faced by such large-scale developments.