Police clash with supporters demanding Imran Khan's release
- Pakistani police clashed with supporters of Imran Khan near Islamabad as they attempted to march for his release.
- The protests defied a lockdown and rally ban, resulting in severe confrontations and injuries.
- The violent clashes reflect the ongoing political tensions in Pakistan and the challenges faced by Imran Khan's party.
In Islamabad, Pakistan, on November 24, 2024, police engaged with supporters of imprisoned former Prime Minister Imran Khan as they attempted to enter the capital to stage a sit-in for his release. Demonstrators traveled approximately 150 kilometers from the northwest despite a government-imposed lockdown and a ban on rallies. The police's use of tear gas and previous arrests failed to deter thousands of marchers, many of whom donned protective gear. The violence led to injuries, with at least one police officer reported killed amidst the unrest. The protests arose in the context of ongoing political tension, as Khan faces more than 150 criminal charges, which his party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, claims are politically motivated. The day before the clashes, Khan's party commenced their “long march,” coinciding with the visit of Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, adding to the political stakes of the protest. Although banned from rallying, supporters remained adamant in their intentions to reach Islamabad and remove barriers set by authorities. To curb the protest, over 4,000 Khan supporters were arrested following the order of a recent court ruling banning gatherings in the capital. The government's actions have drawn criticism, as demonstrators argue such measures are attempts to suppress political dissent. The clash continues to exemplify the volatility of Pakistan's political environment, particularly regarding the legacy of Imran Khan and the ongoing tensions with the current government led by Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif. As protests unfold, concerns regarding the economic impact have also surfaced. Economists suggest that the unrest and associated protests could result in significant damage to the already fragile economy, thereby intensifying calls for more dialogue and resolution between the competing political factions in the country.