Gov. Hochul faces lawsuits over congestion pricing plan in New York
- Two lawsuits have been filed against Governor Hochul regarding her congestion pricing plan.
- Hochul's legal team argues that the lawsuits should be dismissed, claiming the plan was never officially canceled.
- Advocacy groups assert that the indefinite pause on congestion pricing could lead to increased pollution and inadequate public transit funding.
Two lawsuits have been filed against Governor Kathy Hochul regarding her decision to pause the congestion pricing plan, which would impose a $15 toll on drivers entering Manhattan below 59th Street. Hochul announced this indefinite pause just before the plan was set to be implemented in June, citing concerns about the economic burden on residents. Her legal team argues that the lawsuits should be dismissed because the plan was never officially canceled, framing the pause as a non-final policy decision rather than a permanent halt. The plaintiffs, including the Riders Alliance, contend that Hochul's pause violates state climate-change laws by allowing more vehicles on the road, which contributes to pollution and undermines public transit funding. They criticize the governor's characterization of the pause as temporary, suggesting it could lead to a permanent halt at her discretion. This has raised concerns about the arbitrary nature of her decision-making process. Supporters of congestion pricing, including Rep. Jerry Nadler, believe the plan will eventually move forward despite the current pause. The delay has resulted in significant financial implications, with $500 million in tolling equipment unused and the MTA forced to alter its construction plans due to the uncertainty of the expected $15 billion revenue. Hochul's administration is reportedly considering a revised version of the congestion pricing plan, which may include new pricing structures and exemptions for certain groups. Further details are anticipated following the upcoming elections in November, as the governor navigates the political landscape surrounding this contentious issue.