David Zweig claims school closures were the biggest mistake of pandemic policies
- Investigative journalist David Zweig discusses the failures of public policy during COVID-19, particularly regarding school closures.
- Zweig points out that schools in the EU reopened safely and without negative consequences for community transmission.
- He concludes that closing schools was a catastrophic decision, and emphasizes the responsibility of media and public officials to question authority.
In the United States, David Zweig, an investigative journalist, highlighted the significant failures in public policy during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly concerning children's education. Zweig emphasized that school closures had devastating and lasting effects on students across the nation. He argued that many elected officials, the medical community, and teachers' unions made misguided decisions that harmed children, and raised concerns about the long-term impact of these policies. While the media largely failed to report on the lack of negative consequences seen in European schools that remained open, Zweig stressed the importance of questioning authority and consistently scrutinizing decision-making during the health crisis. During the early period of the pandemic, schools in the European Union were reopened without significant issues, a fact that Zweig believes underscores the misguided nature of American policies. He asserted that millions of students who returned to school in the EU did not contribute to increased transmission rates, highlighting a stark contrast to the American approach. This led him to argue that there was a lack of accountability for those making such critical decisions, especially among education policymakers and health authorities in the U.S. Zweig also criticized the media's failure to accurately report on these positive outcomes and emphasized the need for a more skeptical and investigative approach to public health decisions. He pointed to the tendency among intellectual elites to engage in groupthink, which often clouded their judgment and led to harmful policy outcomes. Despite the damaging effects of prolonged school closures, many elites continued to defend their actions rather than acknowledge the mistakes made. In conclusion, Zweig's analysis serves as a critical examination of the decisions that were made during the pandemic and the profound consequences they had on children. By failing to proactively question policies and consider the real-life outcomes of school closures, authorities contributed to widespread learning loss and hindered the educational development of countless students. As America moves forward, Zweig's reflections on these experiences underscore the need for accountability and a reevaluation of how such critical public health decisions are made.