NFL"s Controversial Decision to Drop Redskins Name and Logo
- The Washington Redskins featured the likeness of John Two Guns White Calf until 2020.
- The franchise retired the name and logo amid societal pressures related to racial justice.
- Descendants of Two Guns White Calf advocate for the restoration of the old logo as a celebration of Native American history.
Until 2020, the Washington Redskins featured the likeness of John Two Guns White Calf, the last chief of the Blackfoot Tribe, on their helmets and merchandise. The franchise decided to retire the name and logo amid societal pressures related to racial justice movements, effectively removing a significant representation of Native American culture from the NFL. This decision was met with criticism, particularly from the descendants of Two Guns White Calf, who expressed a desire for the restoration of the old logo, viewing it as a point of pride and a celebration of Native American history. The likeness of Two Guns White Calf was created in 1971, long after his death in 1934, and had become a prominent symbol within the franchise. The change to the Washington Commanders name was seen by some as a move to appease critics rather than a genuine acknowledgment of the historical significance of the logo. The family of Two Guns White Calf argues that the logo represented a rich cultural heritage that should be honored rather than erased. The decision to abandon the Redskins name and logo has sparked a broader conversation about cultural representation and the legacy of Native Americans in sports. Many former players and fans have expressed nostalgia for the old name and logo, emphasizing the pride it brought to the team and its supporters. The franchise's new identity has been described as generic, contrasting sharply with the historical significance of the previous branding. In light of these developments, it is essential for the NFL and the Washington franchise to consider the perspectives of those connected to Two Guns White Calf and the cultural implications of their branding choices. Acknowledging this legacy could foster a more inclusive dialogue about representation in sports.