Morena party set to dominate Mexico's Supreme Court
- Mexico conducted its first judicial elections amid significant controversy and low voter turnout, estimated at around 13%.
- Preliminary tallies suggest that the ruling Morena party is on track to gain control over the Supreme Court.
- This election follows a reform moving from appointed to elected judges, raising concerns about judicial independence.
Mexico held its first judicial elections recently, a controversial event marked by low voter participation and widespread criticism. Preliminary vote tallies indicated that the ruling Morena party, led by President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, was on course to gain significant control over the Supreme Court. This election came in the wake of a judicial reform orchestrated by López Obrador, which allowed judges to be elected through popular vote rather than appointed based on merit. The changes were met with fierce opposition from critics who voiced concerns over the potential erosion of judicial independence and the risks of political influence within the judiciary. Despite these criticisms, the Morena party maintained that the reforms were essential for increasing democratic representation and reducing corruption in the judiciary. Supporters of the reform argued that allowing the public to elect judges would create a more accountable and transparent judiciary. However, many voters were confused about the new voting process, leading to participation as low as 13%, a point raised by opponents who described the situation as a 'farce'. Proponents of the reform, including key figures in the Morena party, suggested that this level of participation represented an improvement over the previous system, which involved senators selecting judges from a shortlist prepared by the president. Among the prominent figures in this election was Hugo Aguilar Ortiz, an Indigenous lawyer who was likely to lead the Supreme Court pending the election results. Aguilar’s candidacy reflects a shift in perspective within the Morena party, as calls for greater representation of Indigenous communities gain traction in Mexican politics. The election's outcome could significantly reshape the judiciary, which has been criticized for its ties to corruption and political influence. The opposition has not been silent, with leaders from rival parties like the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) denouncing the election as a 'dark day for democracy'. Demonstrations erupted in response to the perceived threat posed by the Morena party’s consolidation of power, with protestors brandishing slogans denouncing electoral fraud. Critics are particularly concerned that the new judges aligned with Morena will not be able to uphold checks and balances, potentially leading to the judiciary's decline. As results continue to roll in, the implications of these elections for Mexico's legal and political landscape remain a critical topic of debate.