Kamala Harris Nomination Compared to Soviet Union
- The elevation of Kamala Harris is being compared to Soviet Union tactics.
- Critics point out lack of votes and transparency in the nomination process.
- The political move raises concerns among the public about democracy and fairness.
At the recent Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Vice President Kamala Harris was officially nominated as the Democratic candidate for the presidency, following the unexpected withdrawal of President Joe Biden from the race. This development has raised eyebrows, as it appears to mirror tactics reminiscent of Soviet-era political maneuvers, where candidates were often handpicked without the involvement of voters or competitive primaries. Critics have drawn parallels between Harris's nomination and historical instances of political succession in authoritarian regimes. The absence of debates or a democratic selection process has led to accusations that the Democratic Party is adopting a Soviet-style approach to its leadership transitions. This situation echoes the political climate of the 1960s, when leaders were replaced without public input, suggesting a troubling trend in American politics. The notion of "show" elections is not confined to the Democratic Party, as evidenced by Iran's recent presidential election, which followed the death of Ebrahim Raisi. Observers noted that the real power lay with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, with only one viable candidate, Nicolás Maduro, emerging from the process. This raises questions about the integrity of electoral systems in both the U.S. and abroad. As the Democratic National Convention unfolds, concerns grow that the United States may be veering toward a political landscape characterized by limited choices and centralized control, reminiscent of the very regimes that many Americans have historically opposed.