Kyrie Irving faces lawsuit for $400,000 unpaid therapist fees
- Kyrie Irving allegedly owes Natasha McCartney nearly $400,000 for her services during a family retreat.
- The retreat included crisis management and grief counseling after an unexpected death among participants.
- McCartney has filed a lawsuit for breach of contract and seeks payment, intensifying the dispute.
In a recent legal dispute, renowned social worker Natasha McCartney has initiated a lawsuit against NBA player Kyrie Irving, asserting that he has failed to compensate her for services rendered during a family retreat held in North Dakota. This retreat took place during the summer of 2023, specifically from June 28 to July 2, and was meant to promote wellness among Irving's relatives and friends. The situation took a tragic turn when an unexpected death occurred among attendees, prompting McCartney to provide immediate crisis intervention and grief counseling. Her increased workload included navigating relations with law enforcement and making arrangements with the coroner to handle the aftermath of the death. Originally, McCartney had been contracted to facilitate various wellness workshops for roughly 50 to 60 attendees, but this number escalated to around 150 participants. Despite the increased demand for her services, which involved extensive preparation and on-site management, Irving has allegedly withheld payment totaling nearly $400,000. McCartney's invoice outlines various services she provided, including mindfulness gatherings and intensive crisis management, the latter accounting for a significant portion of the costs incurred. The lawsuit cites breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and fraud against Irving, claiming he has failed to respond adequately to previous requests for payment. McCartney's attorney argues that the pursuit of her legal claims stemmed from the lack of direct communication from Irving, who delegated the matter to his representatives without personally addressing the concerns of his former therapist. Legal representatives on both sides have engaged in discussions, although significant differences in opinion regarding the situation persist. As the dispute unfolds in New York State Supreme Court, McCartney is seeking full payment along with interest and legal fees, demonstrating the serious implications of this case for both parties involved. Contractual obligations in high-profile settings such as this can often lead to legal complications, particularly when personal relationships intersect with professional duties. As Irving's response is awaited, the public interest grows regarding how this situation will evolve, as it not only impacts his financial obligations but also his professional reputation and ties to wellness advocacy.