Campus Free Speech, 2024

The author reflects on the unexpected journey of writing a book about free speech on campus, a topic that seemed unlikely just a few years prior. The discussion draws on historical perspectives, particularly the views of Louis Brandeis and Oliver Wendell Holmes, who emphasized the importance of free speech as a means to discover political truth and engage in public discourse. Brandeis argued that freedom of thought and expression are essential for a functioning democracy, while Holmes highlighted the necessity of allowing opposing views to flourish, even if they are unpopular or considered harmful. The text contrasts the foundational beliefs of Brandeis and Holmes, noting that while both are staunch advocates for free speech, their motivations differ significantly. Brandeis is seen as promoting civic engagement and participation in public affairs, viewing it as a duty, whereas Holmes's approach is more libertarian in nature. The author acknowledges the challenges posed by noxious doctrines in public discourse but insists that such expressions are vital for the ongoing search for political truth. The author expresses admiration for Holmes's opinions but also recognizes their limitations, suggesting that while they are valuable, they lack a certain warmth. The piece concludes with a call for vigilance against attempts to suppress unpopular opinions, echoing sentiments from both historical figures. This perspective is particularly relevant in today's polarized climate, where the protection of free speech remains a contentious issue on college campuses.