Former Swimmer Criticizes IOC Over Gender Eligibility in Boxing

In a recent press conference, former swimmer Sharron Davies accused the International Olympic Committee (IOC) of neglect for allowing Imane Khelif and Lin Yu-ting to compete in women's boxing at the Paris Olympics. Davies, alongside Fiona McAnena from the advocacy group Sex Matters, emphasized the dangers of permitting biological males to fight against females, citing research indicating that biological males can punch approximately 162 percent harder than their female counterparts. They called for mandatory sex tests for all competitors to ensure fairness in the sport. The IOC has consistently opposed the implementation of mandatory sex tests, arguing that such measures could stigmatize athletes like Khelif and Lin. Despite the IOC's stance, Davies criticized the organization for prioritizing passport identification over scientific evidence regarding gender differences in boxing. She highlighted the significant physical disparities in the sport, asserting that it is irresponsible to allow male athletes to compete against females without proper screening. As the Olympic women's boxing finals approach, Khelif and Lin are favored to win gold medals. However, the controversy surrounding their participation has sparked public scrutiny. Davies pointed out that a significant majority of the public supported sex testing at the 1996 Atlanta Olympics, indicating a longstanding concern over fairness in women's sports. In response to the criticism, the IOC has reaffirmed its position, maintaining that Khelif and Lin are women, despite their previous disqualifications from International Boxing Association events. The ongoing debate raises critical questions about the protection of biological females in competitive sports.