Muriel Bowser proposes repeal of D.C.'s sanctuary city law amid immigration crackdown

In the United States, Mayor Muriel Bowser of Washington, D.C., has initiated a significant shift in her stance on immigration by proposing a repeal of the city's sanctuary law. This law, which has been in place since Bowser took office in 2015, prohibits local law enforcement from inquiring about the immigration status of detainees and restricts cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The proposed repeal was introduced quietly as part of Bowser's 2026 budget proposal, signaling a drastic change in her approach toward immigration enforcement in light of the ongoing federal immigration policies under the Trump administration. Previously, Bowser was vocal in her support for D.C. as a 'proud sanctuary city,' defending the rights of immigrant communities amidst harsh federal crackdowns under Trump. Her change in policy comes as the Trump administration intensifies its efforts to pressure sanctuary jurisdictions, increasing deportations and threatening funding to noncompliant cities. The Department of Homeland Security recently placed over 500 jurisdictions on notice, claiming that they obstruct federal immigration enforcement, which has added urgency to Bowser's proposal. In the context of a broader national conversation around immigration policies, Bowser's actions could reflect a pragmatic response to the risk of losing federal funding and potential legal repercussions faced by sanctuary cities. The D.C. Council, however, must approve any changes to the budget, meaning that if there is significant opposition from progressive council members, Bowser's initiative could face challenges. This internal division within the D.C. Council highlights the complexities surrounding immigration policy at local levels, as many leaders grapple with balancing community safety and legal obligations to federal immigration laws. The implications of repealing the sanctuary city law in D.C. are vast, as it could radically alter the dynamic between immigrants and local law enforcement. Many argue that such cooperation could lead to increased deportations and discourage immigrants from reporting crimes or seeking assistance in fear of being deported. This discussion underscores the ongoing national debate about how cities should protect or cooperate with immigrant communities, particularly in the face of aggressive federal immigration policies. As Bowser navigates this policy shift, her administration’s position and the council's response will likely set a precedent for how other cities address similar challenges.