Joe Rogan criticizes NYT for calling Constitution a threat to democracy
- Joe Rogan criticized a New York Times article questioning the Constitution's role in democracy.
- The article suggested that the Constitution could be a threat to American politics, particularly regarding Trump's presidency.
- Rogan concluded that such arguments reflect a misguided view of the Constitution's importance in maintaining democracy.
Podcaster Joe Rogan criticized a New York Times article that questioned the U.S. Constitution's role in democracy during an episode of The Joe Rogan Experience. The article, written by Szalai, suggested that the Constitution might be a significant threat to American politics, particularly in light of Donald Trump's presidency, which was enabled by the Electoral College despite losing the popular vote. Rogan expressed disbelief that such a piece could be published, emphasizing the Constitution's historical significance as a foundational document. He argued that the article reflects a broader authoritarian sentiment that seeks to undermine the Constitution, which he believes is essential for maintaining democratic principles. Rogan and his guest, Bret Weinstein, discussed how the left often uses figures like Trump as a justification for extreme arguments against constitutional protections, suggesting that this rhetoric has been a recurring theme in political discourse against various Republican leaders. They concluded that the notion of the Constitution being a threat is not only misguided but also indicative of a deeper ideological struggle within American politics.