Siblings clash with locals over illegal fence in Chesham woods
- Urusa Ahmed and her brother Syed erected an illegal fence in July 2021, blocking public footpaths in Chesham, Buckinghamshire.
- Local residents reacted by vandalizing the fence, leading to police involvement after incidents of destruction were reported.
- The Ahmeds' actions have sparked a significant dispute over land use rights and public access, highlighting tensions between private ownership and community interests.
In July 2021, Urusa Ahmed and her brother Syed sparked a significant dispute with local residents and the council after erecting an illegal iron fence around their two-acre woodland plot in Chesham, Buckinghamshire. This fence obstructed public footpaths, leading to frustration among locals who felt their access to the area was unjustly restricted. The Ahmeds further escalated tensions by installing large security gates and constructing various structures, including a dwelling-type building and a livestock shed, without the necessary planning permissions. The situation intensified as locals, angered by what they perceived as inaction from the council, took matters into their own hands, resulting in vandalism of the fence. Incidents included two men using a sledgehammer to dismantle parts of the fence, prompting police involvement. Residents expressed disbelief at the Ahmeds' actions, with some questioning their claims of farming and the legitimacy of their planning application for a Kimchi farm, which many viewed as a cover for building a family home. Urusa Ahmed defended their right to protect their land, arguing against the locals' perceived entitlement to access it. Despite the ongoing conflict, she was described as polite by some passers-by. The council rejected a retrospective planning application for the fence, mandating compliance by January 2025 unless an appeal is lodged. The Ahmeds' actions and the community's response highlight the complexities of land use rights and public access in areas designated as Outstanding Natural Beauty. This case illustrates the tensions that can arise between private landowners and the public, particularly in regions where access to natural spaces is highly valued. The ongoing dispute raises questions about land ownership, community rights, and the responsibilities of local councils in mediating such conflicts.