EU proposes partial suspension of Israel agreements over Gaza actions

On September 10, 2025, in Strasbourg, France, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen addressed the European Parliament regarding Israel's military actions in Gaza. She announced a cessation of EU payments to Israel due to its perceived violations of human rights and international humanitarian law amid a humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. Von der Leyen emphasized that the use of famine as a weapon of war is unacceptable, urging Europe to take a lead in addressing the situation. While her proposals had some support within the EU, she acknowledged the challenges ahead in garnering a qualified majority from member states, particularly as Germany's historical ties to Israel influenced its stance against sanctions. Germany's reaction was measured, with the German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul stating that the government is awaiting additional details concerning the EU's decision. Despite generally supporting Israel, Germany acknowledges that the conduct exhibited by Israel in Gaza is unacceptable, yet has historically been reluctant to impose sanctions. The reactions from other EU member states vary, with some expressing frustration over previous proposals being dismissed. Von der Leyen's proposal for a partial suspension of the Association Agreement signifies a potential shift in EU foreign policy responsiveness towards Israel amid escalating humanitarian concerns. The EU-Israel Association Agreement, established in 2000, has underpinned relations between the two parties through trade privileges and political engagement. Von der Leyen's proposals include sanctions against extremists and violent actions in the region, aimed at addressing the ongoing conflict. These sanctions would require support from a qualified majority within the EU, which necessitates endorsement from 15 of the 27 member states that represent at least 65% of the participating population. As of the recent developments, it remains uncertain how member states, particularly influential countries like Germany, will respond to these proposals moving forward. The situation in Gaza continues to garner international attention, with accusations from Israel claiming that the decision to suspend EU payments is influenced by Hamas propaganda. The complex dynamics between Israel and the EU are underscored by historical context and evolving geopolitical landscapes in response to military actions and humanitarian crises. Discussion surrounding the effectiveness of international interventions in Israel and Gaza remains highly relevant as the EU navigates its role in addressing human rights and humanitarian violations.