Detransitioner Chloe Cole Responds to Controversial LA Times Article
- Detransitioner Chloe Cole criticized LA Times for misrepresenting her movement against gender change surgeries for minors.
- LA Times article suggested movement could cause harm to trans children, leading to a controversy.
- Chloe Cole responds to the article, defending her stance against gender change surgeries.
Chloe Cole, a prominent detransitioner, has publicly criticized a recent Los Angeles Times article that questioned her motives for sharing her experiences and suggested that her advocacy could endanger transgender youth. Cole, who underwent a double mastectomy at the age of 15, expressed her outrage on social media, labeling the article as "insane." The piece accused her of attempting to "erase transgender children" by voicing her regrets about transitioning and advocating for a ban on medical treatments she once received. The article highlighted concerns from critics who argue that Cole's detransition movement might contribute to increased suicide rates among transgender individuals. Despite these claims, Cole described her movement as "beautiful" and rooted in love during a recent event in Sacramento. Critics worry that her story's amplification may be part of a broader conservative agenda aimed at restricting access to essential care for LGBTQ+ youth, which is crucial for their mental health. Dr. Marci Bowers, president of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), defended gender-related medical interventions, stating they are appropriate for the "vast majority" of patients. She emphasized that medical professionals adhere to strict standards when providing care. Cole has also filed a lawsuit against a medical group, alleging that they conducted a "mutilating" sex change experiment on her, a claim that has drawn significant attention. While Cole has become a vocal opponent of transgender care for minors, she has not responded to requests for comment from media outlets. She previously stated that the treatment options presented to her and her family were framed as necessary to prevent suicide, despite her not experiencing suicidal thoughts at the time.