Georgia AG clears Kemp from investigating election board changes
- Georgia's Attorney General determined that Governor Kemp is not required to investigate State Election Board members amid complaints from Democrats.
- The complaints focused on controversial rule changes and alleged partisan activities by board members just months before the election.
- Kemp's decision not to act may help him avoid conflict with Trump-backed board members as the election approaches.
Georgia's Attorney General, Chris Carr, issued an opinion stating that Governor Brian Kemp is not obligated to investigate members of the State Election Board who faced criticism for implementing last-minute election rule changes. This decision follows complaints from several Georgia Democrats who called for the removal of three Republican board members, citing concerns over partisan activities and procedural irregularities. The board's controversial rules were enacted just months before the upcoming election, raising alarms about potential impacts on election integrity. Kemp sought legal guidance from Carr after the complaints surfaced, particularly regarding his authority to take action against the board members. Carr clarified that state law necessitates a formal complaint before any investigation can be initiated by the governor. This ruling provides Kemp with political cover, allowing him to avoid conflict with the board members who are supported by former President Donald Trump. The relationship between Kemp and Trump has been strained since the governor resisted efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia. However, as the November election approaches, their relationship appears to be improving, with Trump recently expressing praise for Kemp on social media. Meanwhile, Democrats, backed by Kamala Harris's campaign, have filed a lawsuit to challenge the new election rules, arguing that they could lead to delays in certifying election results. Critics of the new rules contend that their vague language could be exploited by county officials, potentially undermining the electoral process in a state that was pivotal in the last presidential election. The outcome of these developments could significantly influence the political landscape in Georgia as the election draws near.