Jun 23, 2025, 9:03 PM
Jun 23, 2025, 8:42 PM

Yvette Cooper moves to designate Palestine Action as a terror group

Highlights
  • Yvette Cooper intends to classify Palestine Action as a terrorist group following severe vandalism at a military base.
  • The damage caused by the group has significant financial implications and has spurred strong public condemnation.
  • The push for proscription reflects deeper tensions in the UK regarding parallels of activism and civil disobedience.
Story

In the United Kingdom, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has announced plans to classify Palestine Action as a terrorist organization following their recent actions. This decision is a direct response to a break-in at RAF Brize Norton, where the group allegedly caused around £30 million worth of damage by vandalizing multiple Voyager aircraft. The incident triggered outrage among politicians and commentators, with calls for accountability from those who have suffered from the damage. The proposed proscription under the Terrorism Act 2000 is significant as it would make any involvement with Palestine Action illegal, with penalties for membership or support. Cooper stated that a draft order would be laid before Parliament on June 30, 2025, adding urgency to the discussion as further investigations into the group's allegations have commenced. Critics of Palestine Action, like GB News host Martin Daubney, have aggressively condemned the group's actions as thuggish and damaging to national assets, while supporters argue that their vandalism is a rightful response to the UK's military support for Israel amid ongoing conflict. As tensions escalate, the discourse surrounding Palestine Action reflects broader public sentiments regarding foreign policy and international law, particularly concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Many supporters claim that the UK’s role in enabling perceived injustices in Gaza justifies their protests, even if those protests translate into criminal acts. Contrarily, opposers maintain that such actions undermine legitimate calls for justice and accountability. The Home Office's decision to move against Palestine Action underscores a significant shift in how civil disobedience is treated in the context of political activism. If Parliament approves the proscriptions, it marks a pivotal moment in UK politics, potentially setting a precedent for how similar groups might be handled in the future, especially those connecting their protests to contentious geopolitical issues.

Opinions

You've reached the end