Lamar Jackson faces backlash for sharing Charlie Kirk's Christian message
- Lamar Jackson reposted a religious message from conservative activist Charlie Kirk on social media.
- The post led to significant backlash from some social media users, primarily from the left.
- Despite the criticism, many praised Jackson for his Christian beliefs and condemned the attacks.
In August 2025, Baltimore Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson ignited a social media controversy after reposting a message by conservative activist Charlie Kirk on the platform X. The post, which read, 'It’s all about Jesus,' led to a wave of criticism from users identified as left-wing, who took issue with both Jackson's endorsement of Kirk’s message and the underlying religious sentiment. Jackson, known for being an outspoken Christian, often shares content that reflects his faith, yet this particular post prompted a backlash that drew significant attention online. Critics of Jackson and Kirk targeted them with harsh comments, some referring to Kirk in derogatory terms and questioning Jackson’s judgment in sharing such a message. Some leftist commenters even suggested Kirk had extreme views, labeling him as 'pro-slavery' and claiming he could have enslaved Jackson if given the opportunity. Other users shared their discontent with Jackson for not being aware of Kirk’s influence and reputation. Yet, despite the negative feedback, a substantial number of users supported Jackson, praising him for his Christian stance and criticizing the attacks on their shared faith. This incident highlighted a broader cultural divide, with divisions not only on political lines but also regarding religious expressions in public life, especially among public figures. While Jackson’s political ideologies remain somewhat ambiguous, his public declaration of faith stands out clearly; he has made a point of thanking God during interviews and public appearances. Following the criticism, Charlie Kirk reaffirmed his religious beliefs, stating that 'Jesus is the way, truth, and life,' aiming to shift focus back to the spiritual message rather than the political discourse. For Jackson, this incident reiterates a pattern where expressions of religion can rapidly become contentious in today's polarized environment. The reaction he faced serves as a reminder of the potential risks public figures take when they openly share their beliefs, regardless of the intended message or sentiment behind them. Despite the backlash, Jackson seems undeterred and has consistently maintained his commitment to his faith throughout his career.