Trump claims border is most secure with record low illegal crossings

In February 2025, reports emerged indicating significant decreases in illegal border crossings in the United States, marking historic lows. This reduction was attributed to recent policy changes and enforcement measures implemented by the Trump administration, which returned to power after the previous administration's approach to border security. During an interview, President Donald Trump emphasized the improvements, suggesting that the border's security status had reversed from what he described as years of neglect during his predecessor's tenure. Trump voiced his satisfaction with this development, suggesting it reflected a more secure national situation compared to the past. Kristen Welker, an NBC host, engaged the president in a discussion about the current status of border security and crossings. Throughout the interview, Trump highlighted the results of the administration's crackdown on illegal immigration, portraying the decreased crossings as a positive outcome for the nation. He pointed to the various executive orders and policies enacted during his first 100 days in office that contributed to this shift. During this time, the administration reported significant deportation efforts, with claims of around 100,000 individuals removed from the country since taking office. Despite the successes reported in border control, Trump faced criticism regarding other aspects of his policy agenda, particularly concerning trade and tariffs. Many Americans expressed concerns that these economic strategies might lead to increased prices and supply shortages. The mixed reception of Trump's broader policies stood in contrast to the support he received for his immigration enforcement actions, which seemed to resonate positively with some constituents. The conversation ultimately showcased the stark divisions within American society regarding immigration policy and border security. While Trump celebrated the progress made under his administration, the public remained divided, with debates surrounding immigration enforcement, humanitarian concerns, and economic impacts continuing to circulate.