Bernie Sanders backs Canada as the 51st state for universal healthcare
- During a meeting in Florida on November 29, Donald Trump suggested Canada could become the 51st state.
- Canadian politicans, including Ontario Premier Doug Ford, reacted against the idea, emphasizing national sovereignty.
- The discussion has reignited debates on healthcare, with Bernie Sanders linking it to potential benefits if Canada were a state.
In a notable exchange during a meeting at Mar-a-Lago, Florida, the then incoming U.S. President Donald Trump jokingly suggested that Canada could become the 51st state of the United States. This comment, made on November 29, intrigued many as it occurred during a dinner with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, addressing various subjects from trade to security, highlighting the complexity and interconnectedness of U.S.-Canada relations. Trump's playful reference to Canada as a U.S. state was echoed in a post on social media where he claimed that many Canadians desired this change for benefits such as tax savings and military protection. In the wake of these comments, prominent Canadian politicians reacted to Trump's remarks with a mix of humor and sternness. For instance, Ontario Premier Doug Ford emphatically stated that Canada would never become the 51st state. Furthermore, Trudeau's then-Public Safety Minister, Dominic LeBlanc, remarked that Trump's comments were made in jest and indicated a teasing nature rather than a serious proposal. However, with Trump reiterating the taunt several times, it sparked a dialogue among Canadian politicians and the public about national sovereignty and identity. Senator Bernie Sanders capitalized on Trump's statehood proposition by linking it to the ongoing discourse on universal healthcare, suggesting that if Canada became a state, perhaps the U.S. could adopt its more affordable healthcare model. Sanders pointed out that Canada's per capita healthcare spending is significantly lower than that of the U.S., igniting a critical conversation surrounding health policies and cost distribution in the United States. Despite the humorous context, the underlying implications of such discussions reveal the fraught dynamics between the U.S. and Canada, especially regarding economic and healthcare policies. Constitutional experts have noted the considerable legal and cultural barriers that would need to be addressed for such political changes to occur, emphasizing the likelihood that these discussions will remain speculative. The interaction between Trump and Trudeau, exemplified by these comments, reflects the extensive and often complicated relationship between the two neighboring countries, while also reigniting public interest in both nations' healthcare systems.