Minnesota court upholds voting misinformation ban in 2023 ruling

In a recent ruling, Judge Nancy Brasel of the District of Minnesota upheld a new statute aimed at combating misinformation about voting mechanics and voter eligibility. This law prohibits individuals from knowingly disseminating false information intended to impede or prevent others from exercising their right to vote, particularly within 60 days of an election. The statute specifically addresses misinformation regarding the time, place, and manner of elections, as well as voter eligibility qualifications. The Minnesota Voters Alliance (MVA) challenged the law, arguing that it infringed upon their rights and that the Re-Enfranchisement Act, which restored voting rights to individuals with felony convictions, was unconstitutional. However, the court found that the MVA's concerns were unfounded, as the law allows for a defense if the speaker has a good-faith belief in the truthfulness of their statements. The court emphasized that the state has a compelling interest in reducing misinformation that could confuse voters or undermine their ability to participate in elections. The ruling clarified that the law does not restrict political speech regarding candidates or ballot questions but focuses specifically on the eligibility and procedural aspects of voting. Ultimately, the court's decision reinforces the state's authority to regulate false information related to voting, ensuring that voters are protected from misleading claims that could affect their participation in the electoral process.