Trump and Harris prepare for pivotal debate showdown

During a recent analysis on Newsmax TV, former presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. criticized the ABC News debate moderators, David Muir and Linsey Davis, for their perceived bias against Donald Trump. He argued that the moderators focused on fact-checking Trump while allowing Vice President Kamala Harris to evade scrutiny regarding her performance on key issues. Kennedy highlighted that Harris has had four years to address significant problems, particularly in border policy, which he claims has worsened under her watch. Kennedy emphasized that Harris was appointed as the border czar, making her responsible for the administration's border policies. He noted that Trump dedicated considerable time during the debate to discussing these issues, suggesting that Harris's failure to deliver on her promises has led to what he described as the worst border policy in American history. This assertion reflects a broader critique of the current administration's handling of immigration and border security. The debate showcased a stark contrast in accountability, with Kennedy pointing out that while Trump faced rigorous questioning, Harris's responses went largely unchallenged. This dynamic raises questions about the role of moderators in political debates and their influence on public perception of candidates. Kennedy's comments underscore a growing sentiment among some voters that the media may not be providing a balanced platform for all candidates, particularly in high-stakes debates. As the election cycle progresses, the implications of such perceived biases could significantly impact voter opinions and the overall political landscape.