Slovakia refuses to back changes to the Green Deal in Brussels

In Bratislava on September 17, 2025, Slovak Environment Minister Tomáš Taraba publicly declared that Slovakia will not support proposed changes to the Green Deal during upcoming meetings of the EU Council for the Environment in Brussels. These proposed changes included tightening emission standards that were initially set to apply only by 2050, now being considered for implementation by 2040. Taraba warned that such measures could lead to the exodus of European industry, damaging the economic interests of his nation and others. He emphasized that Slovakia's position is not just to passively agree with agreements made by Brussels officials. During the meetings, he further stressed that any decision regarding substantial changes in climate law should involve prime ministers and heads of state rather than being decided by ministers alone. He noted that the proposed amendments contained far-reaching goals to achieve a 90 percent reduction in emissions by 2040 compared to 1990 levels. The minister expressed satisfaction that the council did not hold a vote that day, stating that the proposal lacked the necessary consensus among the countries involved. Slovakia has been striving to meet emission reduction goals for 2030, which are specified at a 50 percent reduction and which they are currently fulfilling, contrary to the EU average. Tomáš Taraba's statements reflect the broader concerns shared by Slovakia and other nations about the European Union's ambitious climate targets. He highlighted the need for thorough analysis to evaluate how such targets could impact specific countries and their economic sectors. Taraba’s position confirms Slovakia's advocacy for technological neutrality in emissions policies, particularly regarding the treatment of low-emission energy sources, such as nuclear power. The Slovak Republic aims for an energy policy that supports its national priorities while still conforming to EU framework initiatives. The issue of stricter emissions targets is hotly debated in Europe, with varied perspectives across member states. Some countries advocate for aggressive climate goals, while others prefer to maintain existing agreements. The division reflects concerns over economic viability given the costs associated with meeting such targets. Taraba pointed out that countries like Poland could face significant expenses and potential factory closures to reach the suggested emission reductions. Ultimately, he concluded that discussions around these legislative changes must consider the implications for national economies, as well as ensuring that energy sources like nuclear power do not get sidelined in EU policies.