UK government angered as Jacques Chirac blocks military action in Iraq
- In March 2003, Jacques Chirac declared France would veto a UN resolution supporting military action in Iraq, causing frustration among UK government officials.
- UK Prime Minister Tony Blair and ministers described the French stance as undermining the UN's authority and expressed the need for military intervention if Saddam Hussein did not comply with UN demands.
- Following this, the UK joined the US-led invasion of Iraq on March 20, 2003, despite significant public opposition, leading to lasting consequences for Blair's leadership.
In the lead-up to the Iraq War, significant tensions arose between the United Kingdom and France concerning military intervention. In March 2003, as the UK government prepared for action, Jacques Chirac publicly stated that France would veto any United Nations resolution supporting military action against Iraq. This announcement triggered reactions from UK ministers, highlighting their belief that the French position undermined the United Nations' role in maintaining international order. During an emergency cabinet meeting on March 17, 2003, UK Prime Minister Tony Blair expressed that they had exhausted diplomatic avenues with France, which he accused of failing to recognize the need for military response if Saddam Hussein did not comply with UN obligations. The British cabinet noted that Chirac's actions created a strategic divide between France and the UK, complicating the situation further. Consequently, Blair announced an ultimatum for Saddam Hussein to leave Iraq, ensuring that the House of Commons would be called to endorse military action if necessary. On March 20, 2003, the UK joined the US-led invasion of Iraq, which faced public opposition, evidenced by massive protests in London. The consequences of this decision would ultimately lead to significant consequences for Blair's government as the justification for war—allegations of weapons of mass destruction—was later discredited. This profound miscalculation culminated in a political backlash and inquiries, reflecting a long-term impact on UK foreign policy and public perception of the Iraq conflict.