Muslim land endowments in India exceed the size of Mauritius

In India, a proposal by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Hindu nationalist government to amend laws regarding Muslim endowments has stirred significant unrest among the minority Muslim community. The amendments aim to enhance efficiency and root out corruption within waqf bodies, which manage properties donated by Muslims for religious and charitable purposes. The existing governance of these properties is regulated by the Waqf Act of 1995, which allows minorities to manage their institutions under Article 26 of the constitution. However, the BJP argues that Muslim personal laws contravene the principle of equality outlined in Article 14. The proposed changes include provisions permitting non-Muslims to join waqf boards, a move defended by some as a step towards inclusivity and secularism in India. Supporters of the amendments suggest that there is a pressing need for reform to ensure accountability of income from waqf properties. However, skepticism runs deep within the Muslim community regarding the True intent of these amendments. Critics argue that the ruling government's agenda may not be focused on addressing corruption but rather on diminishing the presence and influence of institutions that benefit Muslims. Significantly, fears surrounding the amendments are fueled by the historical context of waqf properties, many of which are ancient and may lack proper documentation. Legal experts express concern that such properties, including graveyards, mosques, and schools, could become entangled in legal disputes due to the proposed changes. Individuals in states with hostile government attitudes, like Uttar Pradesh, believe that these amendments could lead to the targeting of mosques lacking clear land records, posing a direct threat to the religious heritage and identity of the Muslim community. Despite reassurances from proponents of the amendments that no provisions exist for government seizure of mosques or graveyards, the sentiment within the community remains one of caution and apprehension. There is a clear demand for transparency and consultation with Muslims during the reform process, highlighting the desire for cooperative governance rather than imposed changes. The complexity of this issue lies in balancing governmental oversight of waqf properties against the preservation of minority rights in a secular state. These developments indicate an ongoing struggle over the control and management of cultural and religious assets in India.