Steve Rosenberg: Russian snitching evokes ghosts of the past

Since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, there has been a notable increase in Russians reporting each other for alleged anti-war sentiments. This phenomenon has manifested in various forms, including students informing on teachers and colleagues reporting one another. The atmosphere of distrust has been exacerbated by the introduction of laws against 'fake news about the army,' which has led to a culture reminiscent of Soviet-era practices of snitching. Personal grievances often fuel these reports, as seen in the case of Anna Alexandrova and her neighbor Irina Sergeyeva, where a land dispute escalated into accusations of anti-war statements. The implications of this behavior extend beyond individual cases, reflecting a broader societal shift towards fear and self-preservation at the expense of community bonds. The Russian state appears to be fostering an environment where citizens feel justified in acting as informers, creating a divide between 'us' and 'them.' This has led to a chilling effect on free expression, as individuals become wary of speaking out against the government or the war. In a recent court case, Anna faces severe penalties based solely on the word of her neighbor, highlighting the precarious nature of justice in this context. The lack of concrete evidence underscores the arbitrary nature of these accusations, which can stem from personal vendettas rather than genuine concerns about national security. As the trial unfolds, the experiences of those involved reveal the painful legacy of Russia's past, where fear and suspicion have historically shaped social interactions. The current climate raises questions about the future of Russian society and the potential for solidarity amidst growing divisions.