Judge orders VTA workers back to work after strike ruling

In March 2025, a labor strike involving over 1,500 workers of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) unfolded in the South Bay region of California. The strike began on March 10, following the expiration of an existing contract between VTA and the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 265. Workers, including bus and light rail operators, maintenance staff, dispatchers, fare inspectors, and customer service representatives took to the picket lines, demanding better pay and working conditions amidst rising living costs in Silicon Valley. A week before the strike, VTA had proposed an 11% pay raise over three years, which workers overwhelmingly rejected, citing it was insufficient given their financial struggles. On March 26, 2025, the situation escalated when the VTA sought judicial intervention, claiming the union had violated a no strike clause outlined in their contract. A Santa Clara County Superior Court ordered the union to appear in court to justify continuing the strike. Ultimately, the judge ruled that the strike must end, prompting workers to return to their positions under their old contract, meaning they would not receive the requested raises. Employees expressed disappointment with the ruling, emphasizing their ongoing financial challenges, including mortgage and basic living expenses. Although VTA workers were scheduled to resume bus services by March 28, light rail operations would take additional time to restart. The court's decision was welcomed by the agency, as it would allow a significant number of public transport users to regain access to essential services. However, workers' representatives indicated that while they were the second highest paid transit workers in California, the pay offered still left them struggling. Following the court ruling, employee Salas, who had worked with VTA for 19 years, spoke of the difficult conditions facing workers, highlighting their desire for fair wages in light of the increased cost of living in the area. Despite this setback, Salas remained hopeful that the workers would continue to advocate for better treatment and benefits, showcasing the solidarity among union members during the strike.