Renewable energy jobs surpass nuclear employment in Australia
- Luke Hilakari, Secretary of the Victorian Trades Hall Council, argued that renewables could yield 26,000 jobs, whereas nuclear could only create around 400.
- The Victorian Trades Hall Council is engaged in discussions regarding nuclear energy amid an opposition push for a nuclear strategy.
- The union believes focusing on renewables is more beneficial for unionized workers despite higher wages in the nuclear sector.
In Australia, a discussion emerged surrounding the job creation potential of renewable energy compared to nuclear power. During a recent inquiry regarding nuclear power generation, Luke Hilakari, Secretary of the Victorian Trades Hall Council, spoke on behalf of over 40 unions. He asserted that the renewable energy sector could potentially generate up to 26,000 jobs, which he argued would far surpass the nuclear industry's job contributions. Hilakari pointed out that a nuclear plant might only yield about 400 jobs, with a mere quarter of those being blue-collar positions. The debate comes amid an opposition push for a nuclear energy strategy to challenge the government’s renewable energy policies. While acknowledging that some coal plant workers could transition into nuclear jobs, Hilakari contended that the future of employment is more secure in the renewable sector. He expressed concerns regarding the nuclear sector's limited job offerings and potential impediments to investments in renewable projects. O'Brien, representing a contrasting viewpoint, highlighted the financial advantages of nuclear careers, noting that nuclear workers earn significantly more compared to coal and renewable energy workers. Hilakari acknowledged the appeal of higher wages but reiterated the importance of job quantity over pay alone. He questioned the necessity of pursuing nuclear power when the country has the capacity to develop renewable sources like wind and solar. The council has felt the effects of energy sector shifts, notably following the closure of the Hazelwood Power Station in 2017, which led to a drastic reduction in local jobs and economic stability. Mayor Harriman indicated that the community had yet to recover fully from this loss, dealing with decreased retail shopping and falling housing values. In light of the nuclear discussion, some local power plant workers expressed optimism regarding the transition to nuclear jobs, seeing it as a hopeful alternative after the closure.