Sep 19, 2025, 8:00 AM
Sep 17, 2025, 12:00 AM

Trump threatens RICO Act action against liberal groups after Kirk's assassination

Provocative
Highlights
  • In response to Charlie Kirk's assassination, Trump has threatened to invoke the RICO Act against liberal groups.
  • More than 500 organizations have condemned Trump's actions, arguing they threaten First Amendment rights.
  • Political violence and threats against non-profits illustrate the increasing tensions between progressive and conservative groups.
Story

In the United States, following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk at a Utah university, President Donald Trump has threatened to utilize the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, popularly known as RICO. This threat comes amid a rise in political tensions and accusations aimed at liberal groups that oppose Trump's administration. Trump has claimed these organizations have been involved in coordinating protests that lead to violence, despite a lack of evidence linking them to Kirk's death. More than 500 left-leaning organizations have responded vehemently against Trump's threats, stating it infringes upon their First Amendment rights. In an open letter, these groups argued that the exploitation of Kirk's assassination as a reason for governmental action against them is both un-American and damaging. They emphasized that they did not partake in Kirk's murder and warned against using governmental power for political ends. The political climate has intensified as Trump and his administration suggested sanctions against organizations perceived as leftist, including stripping their tax-exempt status. This aligns with Trump's designation of the far-left Antifa as a terrorist organization in a bid to legitimize governmental action against protests that challenge his policies. Prominent liberal advocates, including members of the American Civil Liberties Union, have organized efforts to combat what they describe as unjust targeting of non-profits. While Trump’s administration seeks to galvanize support for these actions, critics caution that branding protests, particularly lawful ones, as criminal could intimidate citizens from voicing their opinions. Experts on RICO emphasize the complexities involved in obtaining convictions under these laws, which require substantial evidence linking donations specifically to violent outcomes. The ramifications of these actions could have lasting effects on free speech, non-profit operations, and political discourse across the nation.

Opinions

You've reached the end